🏠
Author: sfrost.bsky.social (did:plc:szviw2goiw6kjdjgqbnfp2p2)

Record🤔

uri:
"at://did:plc:szviw2goiw6kjdjgqbnfp2p2/app.bsky.feed.post/3l4kz4j7cqt2m"
cid:
"bafyreih3k6rzirroxe2uedegqdgsvmd5fgs3u3yi4jhdfnlq45do2ddqry"
value:
text:
"“Trying to reduce driving is a fool’s errand”

How many times have I heard this?

This extract from @davidzipper.bsky.social’s newsletter captures my own experience with some in industry, as well as civil servants.

We need electric cars but reducing demand is the only way to hit our climate targets"
$type:
"app.bsky.feed.post"
embed:
$type:
"app.bsky.embed.images"
images:
  • alt:
    "I recently joined a small webinar of American transportation professionals who were invited to discuss strategies to decarbonize transportation. One of the participants, an executive at a global car company, declared that there was only one realistic path forward: Electrify cars as quickly as possible, whatever it takes. Trying to reduce driving, he said, is a fool’s errand; Americans are simply unwilling to do it.
     
    To put it charitably, I found his argument unconvincing. Modern Americans have not shown themselves committed to driving; urban sprawl and scant transit service have left them no viable alternative. Road pricing, such as NYC’s paused congestion pricing plan, could have a dramatic effect reducing driving, particularly if proceeds are used to improve transit and biking (let’s hope so, because researchers have shown that in the absence of mode shift from cars, even the most optimistic electrification projections cannot prevent a two-degree increase in global temperatures)."
    image:
    View blob content
    $type:
    "blob"
    mimeType:
    "image/jpeg"
    size:
    433444
    aspectRatio:
    width:
    750
    height:
    1157
langs:
  • "en"
facets:
createdAt:
"2024-09-20T07:13:00.292Z"