Record🤔

uri:

"at://did:plc:efpytyxmwow5ffwi3dphhrlq/app.bsky.feed.post/3kmqmcet2sg2e"

cid:

"bafyreiefpbuab3aihx6symyl6amlqtv2hubpdelvantk6bd5kfyqkj57vu"

value:

text:

"Friday's federal court ruling is the most thorough, though far from the first, to reject the notion that illegal migration is invasion. The Constitution's text and original meaning are clear, writes Ilya Somin: only an armed attack qualifies as "invasion.""

$type:

"app.bsky.feed.post"

embed:

$type:

"app.bsky.embed.external"

external:

uri:

"https://reason.com/volokh/2024/03/01/federal-court-rejects-texass-argument-that-illegal-migration-qualifies-as-invasion/"

thumb:

View blob content

$type:

"blob"

ref:

$link:

bafkreibyhs3rvykx7twatnhccvbtcwpv7e6ak2uugnmi7qcdye75y6fepi

mimeType:

"image/jpeg"

size:

493444

title:

"Federal Court Rejects Texas's Argument that Illegal Migration Qualifies as "Invasion""

description:

"The ruling has the most extensive discussion of the meaning of "invasion" in the Constitution ever included in a court decision."

langs:

• "en"

createdAt:

"2024-03-02T21:56:30.338Z"