🏠
Author: petefrasermusic.bsky.social (did:plc:6zq72tchgzxigxat34bhruh7)

Record🤔

uri:
"at://did:plc:6zq72tchgzxigxat34bhruh7/app.bsky.feed.post/3l35w4mxtgy2x"
cid:
"bafyreicustmav76tcfy5vrn77yw733lmjg4i2kedw3trjp4bckca3xvjka"
value:
text:
"…and a clarifying statement that somehow makes it… worse? 

Inclusivity is absolutely NOT about saying to people with access to limited resources or different abilities ‘hey, here’s a tool so you can write like a Normal Person’ it’s about amplifying work that *itself looks different*."
$type:
"app.bsky.feed.post"
embed:
$type:
"app.bsky.embed.images"
images:
  • alt:
    "• Classism. Not all writers have the financial ability to hire humans to help at certain phases of their writing.
    For some writers, the decision to use Al is a practical, not an ideological, one. The financial ability to engage a human for feedback and review assumes a level of privilege that not all community members possess.
    • Ableism. Not all brains have same abilities and not all writers function at the same level of education or proficiency in the language in which they are writing.
    Some brains and ability levels require outside help or accommodations to achieve certain goals. The notion that all writers "should" be able to perform certain functions independently or is a position that we disagree with wholeheartedly. There is a wealth of reasons why individuals can't "see" the issues in their writing without help.
    • General Access Issues. All of these considerations exist within a larger system in which writers don't always have equal access to resources along the chain. For examp"
    image:
    View blob content
    $type:
    "blob"
    mimeType:
    "image/jpeg"
    size:
    706864
    aspectRatio:
    width:
    1170
    height:
    1569
langs:
  • "en"
reply:
root:
cid:
"bafyreidmgz6gglqb5gm42yqk6o4pam3hzgvyqyh5gzobguif36mtkilbf4"
parent:
cid:
"bafyreic6ed5nhu3a6wf7s5736r7omgxpd5iuezyfafj2sjqg2ggtymbkgq"
createdAt:
"2024-09-02T08:49:34.752Z"