Record🤔
cid:
"bafyreigsyhtuq24anaze4mvirutflnvryo7fst63jo2jkssplpyjgjctey"
value:
text:
"judith butler just absolutely bodying Kathleen stock is my new favorite Olympic sport"
$type:
"app.bsky.feed.post"
embed:
$type:
"app.bsky.embed.images"
images:
alt:
"What assumptions are made in this argument, and how much of what passes as argument is phantasmatic sliding in the service of fear-mongering? Are they grounded? Stock's valid concern is that no woman should be subject to possible rape, and I agree that everyone should share that concern. And yet, if securing women against rape in prison were her main focus, should she not first consult the statistics on male prison guards engaging in precisely that activity, which, given their magnitude, should, according to her logic, lead to a policy in which no man ever works as a prison guard in any women's prison? Perhaps she has signed petitions to this effect or written on this policy, but I am"
image:
View blob content
$type:
"blob"
mimeType:
"image/jpeg"
size:
766730
aspectRatio:
width:
2000
height:
913
alt:
"not finding it in my research. And what about sexual abuse inflicted by women (assigned female at birth) against other women? Many people report abuse by women, so it hardly seems right to imagine that only those assigned male at birth are capable of abuse or assault. The problem is not just that certain stories and incidents are foregrounded over oth-ers, but that such incidents launch a chain of escalating claims until a general picture of reality is achieved, even though it is no more than a specter-infused hypothetical that is meant to stoke fear and scapegoat an entire class of people."
image:
View blob content
$type:
"blob"
mimeType:
"image/jpeg"
size:
772415
aspectRatio:
width:
2000
height:
862
langs:
"en"
createdAt:
"2024-08-16T18:52:03.554Z"
